A Million Lies

Even though it was, I think, only yesterday that something provided the vague prompt that there might be a poem there, I can't remember what it was.

Not to worry. I've been more or less in a state of thinking I'd not write another poem for most of the time I've been writing them so I thought I'd try. It can easily be removed from here if, after its subsequent review, it is found not good enough. But I'm glad enough to have it for now.

It's about Marco Polo, the reports he took back to Venice from his trip into the East. For the most part, I believe him but I wouldn't blame those who didn't at the time because, if I'd been there then, I'd have suspected him of being a purveyor of fake news and, like it says, science fiction with which to astound the gullible masses. 

Maybe I'll get his book, read it and write a better poem later but there is this for now. I'm not unhappy with it. We will find out after a couple of weeks if it still looks okay but this having once been established as a website to 'promote' my poems, it's long overdue that it featured such a thing.

  
A Million Lies

He had been there and back, he said, 

Seen unicorns and behaviour
Beyond their quaint imagining.
Some bought it all and bought the book
While others would have none of it
And went back to their boring work
Or stared into the drab canal.
And even those carving the stone
On the ornate basilica,
Who had little faith in dragons
Or that it could be turtles
All the way down weren’t as tempted
As they might have been.

He might not have been anywhere,
No further than, say, Antioch,
Made most of the rest of it up
And then pretended to come back
With his crazy science fiction
To make such a name for himself.
He got that far, at least.

Lucas, Bach Piano, Scannell

There was always much to like about John Lucas, Many years ago I read his survey, Modern English Poetry: From Hardy to Larkin. Later his book on Notts cricket, The Trent Bridge Battery. Another time I'd ordered books from his Shoestring Press. And eventually I realized it was all the same bloke, also jazzman, Prof. of English and novelist. 

Recent obituaries mentioned his last novel, That Little Thread (Greenwich Exchange, 2023), thought it sounded worth a go and was proved right. Peter Simpson, Professor at a Midlands university, is approached by a 'wide boy' who had been the unlikely father of a child born to 'Paddy', a star student from twenty years earlier who left before graduating and reportedly died during childbirth. And thus we are on the trail of what really happened.

One might think a novel about middle class academic life written by one such could be a bit self-contained and there are larger concerns beyond its limited milieu but they have lives like anybody else and the fact that theirs is based around writing essays in pursuit of a certificate shouldn't detract from its potential too much.

It's a steady, good book done by one who had done it before and knows how to. It brought to mind Jane Jarmain who is the similarly brilliant, tragically early casualty in Sean O'Brien's Afterlife and perhaps there are comparisons to be made beginning with that motif. 

The future of thge novel is perenially in question but there's no shortage of them. The problem might be that Finnegans Wake seemed to have knocked the ball out of the ground once and for all but, like Theodore Adorno's dictum that there could be no poetry after Auschwitz, there still was. 

Further novels by Lucas might well be on their way here soon. 

--

The disc Allusions and Beyond by Piano Dup Takahashi-Lehmann arrived with its 2.33 of the Bach/Kurtag Gottes Zeit from Cantata BWV 106. Two further such miniatures follow it without achieving the same stillness.

Before them, an arrangement for four hands of Brandenburg Concerto no. 5 is worth having although for once perhaps the very familiar orchestral original is difficult to improve on.

Although I can see how an album or programme can benefit from contrasts, I think I prefer discs that are 'more of the same'. The shift into Bernd Alois Zimmerman's 'Monologe' takes us immediately faraway when we might not be ready to go. If it's philistine not to find its modernist plink, plonk and crash intellectually invigorating then it must be the effect of time increasingly putting a cap on my sympathies for the avant garde. Having been there and done that, I don't feel much need to go back. And then the Brahms Haydn Variations come as some relief but it turns out to have been a disc mainly bought for 2.33 of outrageous charm.

--

Not dissimilar to the Lucas book is Vernon Scannell's Feminine Endings (Enitharmon, 2000), a set piece of the contemporary poetry world all about a residential poetry course. One of the tutor poets is older, male and traditional, the other is female and more challenging. The marital situation of the hosts is becoming fragile as are some of the paying guests, one of who is taking a lot of interest in news reports about the latest woman found murdered. And the premises where it all takes place with readings and writings of poems is haunted.

For all the ready-made humour to be found in the poetry world and the forseeable attitudes and opinions of those involved, it's a neat book encompassing more than might have been expected ot it and Scannell gets it right. It's fairly clear where he stands, that he is more or less Gordon Napier, brought in as a last-minute, stopgap replacement for the indisposed Brian MacDuff, who is presumably George MacBeth.

Some of the poets mentioned are fictitional but most of the poems are real. I don't think it's obvious who Gabriella Cornwell is which is a good thing because it might be actionable but at least she wins a major, international prize for her opaque efforts. It could be used as a text to introduce the poetry of its time and might yet be if I pursue the recently occuring idea to do something about the 1990's which, whether or not it did at the time, looks like a Golden Age by now. 

Next Prime Minister Betting

 Here's a wide-open market for those who think that Cheltenham, the Grand National, the ITV7 or the Lottery are too easy,

Next UK Prime Minister, a snapshot as of this moment because it could look very different by this time tomorrow.

This doesn't mean 'after the next General Election', it means next incumbent of 10 Downing Street and, given Ed's position in the market, I'd take that to mean including any so-called 'caretaker',

Angela Rayner	14/5
Wes Streeting	13/2
Ed Miliband	7/1
Shabana Mahmood	12/1
Nigel Farage	16/1,

so, you can have Kemi at 33's for looking around but 14/1 is the meanest offer. William Hill make Farage a 6/1 shot.

I'm told by Times Radio that, as a regular listener to Times Radio, I'm well informed about politics and it's true that without them I wouldn't have heard of Alistair Carns, 16/1, but even with their help, I'd never heard of Lee Pitcher, 25/1.

 

I lost more money than I imagined possible in 2016 when Trump beat Hillary Clinton and the referendum said Leave. That disastrous year was thus declared the last time I'd ever bet on politics because there is no way of assessing how it works any more.

How we'd love it if it was still possible for Robert Mckenzie and his swing-o-meter to detect a 2% swing and thus a change of MP for the likes of Swindon South. But it's not like that any more. Us olde worlde liberal/left are bereft and clinging to driftwood, trying to work out why Farage isn't a shorter price than he is to win the next General Election because nobody ever went poor by under-estimating the taste of the general public.

 

The Labour candidate for Prime Minister then is unlikely to be Keir Starmer, decent man though he is. So, if we did have to bet on Next UK PM, we are looking for a promotion from within. Angela would turn out to be rubbish, much as we love her. Andy Burnham is 16/1 even though not currently qualified to run. Wes Streeting might look like the class act but it's the sort of race that might not suit a front-runner. I well remember our own Penny Mordaunt being odds on, about 8/13, to be the next Prime Minister but not long after that she was most shamefully supporting Boris.

Not that it might matter too much because the next General Election already looks unwinnable, but I'd go for Shabana Mahmood, for preference and for the bet. Because she's so far the least tainted. Although it won't take long in 'power' for her to become so.

It's an impossible job but not quite as impossible as Boris, Liz Truss and then, sadly, Starmer, made it look.  

He hasn't resigned yet, has he. One last check. No, he hasn't.

 

The Lives of the Poets and other stories

 There was a time, a long time ago, when I didn't ever read biographies. It might have been part of a purist thing when I thought novels were proper writing. It was probably related to how I didn't write anything apart from poems. But the story of a life can often be how one changes from one thing to another, like Wittgenstein writing the Tractatus and then, later, another book that contradicts it. So now I write poems rarely but have tried, with less or even less success, most genres except libretti or a maintenance manual for the Triumph Herald.

Similarly with biographies. I read more of them than novels these days. Mostly poets, my shelves overflow with them. Any number relating to Shakespeare, 4 Auden, 3 Larkin, 3 Eliot, 3 Donne. I'm not sure there's anything one can generalize from them and sometimes wonder about the biography of an apparently more mundane tradesperson, like the proprietor of a local grocer's shop. Why would that not be more interesting.

The lives of Pushkin and Byron are the high lives of Romantic excess. Those of Larkin, Charlotte Mew and Elizabeth Jennings not quite so much. Poets in previous centuries were mostly men of some privilege until the C20th it became a bit more democratic. Poetry can be a self-indulgent thing. Do those who dedicate themselves to it do so heroically for the sake of their art and do they use it as an excuse to sacrifice consideration for others in the interests of their pre-occupation.

How much suffering is it worth to produce art of some value. Beethoven surely suffered but was rewarded with a body of work that precious few can compare with. But since it was his own suffering, it's mainly up to him. I'm more concerned with those who made others suffer.

We might think of Ted Hughes, Eliot and Hardy whose treatment of the women in their lives was selfish. And now Vernon Scannell.

Finishing Walking Wounded today, these questions arose. He dedicated himself to his art and his manifesto is to be admired but he was one among several names of his period and hardly one of the greatest names of his generation. But the cost it came at was immense. That he couldn't help his drinking and habitual violence is one thing and his own distress as a result of it is what he had to bear. But it's not a pleasant book to read and one tends to think that a life's work of well-made but not colossally brilliant poems does not balance out the way he treated a succession of partners.

I'd never like to say that any mere art work would be worth the real life pain inflicted on others. Poems, and art of any kind, is second-hand, not real and only words on a page - however much they are valued as such- whereas bruises and injuries are first-hand and not imaginary. We must never allow ourselves to become so precious about art that we forget its secondary status.

Scannell was a novelist, too, and this reading sequence continues into an order for Feminine Endings, a late book apprently very thinly based on Arvon Creative Writing course with tutors who may not be but probably are Scannell and Hughes. It sounds very much like an industry insider job but that might not prevent it being any good. It follows on from the TLS review on 'the state of poetry', Rory Waterman's essays and reviews and the Scannell biography, which each suggested the next. In between, and loosely related, begun today, is That Little Thread, the last novel by John Lucas, admirable man. That has begun most readably.

--

But, on the subject of 'bodies of work', the end of the Complete Works of Bach is sort of in sight. There's much organ music to go, the big oratorios and miscellaneous discs but the full picture is coming into sight.

It's never a chore but one only gets through 172 discs by applying oneself to them dutifully.

After 50+ discs of cantatas one can't help but think that his reputation would have been no less if he had written half as many and the same is passably true of the organ music. I'm naturally suspicious of anybody too prolific but there are some who, having provided so much, you can hardly throw any away and, anyway, it's not the complete Bach because a couple of further pieces have been discovered and accredited to him while I've been listening to them.

And we need not worry too much about 'authenticity'. Some of us - me, at least- have been tuned in to the keyboard music through the piano, not invented in Bach's time so clearly not how he heard them, but the accidental stumbling across transcriptions for four hands by Gyorgy Kurtág. The fact that Cantata 106 is sublime overrides any consideration of how Bach heard his own music and whether it was keyboard music or a cantata in the first place doesn't matter much. All Bach played on the piano is a transcription.

Perhaps the vastness of Bach's output is reduced slightly by realizing that he had his way of doing it. It's not 172 discs of brand new ideas. But if we reduce our assessment a little bit on account of that, it gets multiplied back up again by thinking that if he had only written the solo violin music or only the Cello Suites, or only some of the cantatas or only the keyboard music, as examples, he would be a great composer. One thinks of the Beatles and their reputation, how they gave away songs to Cilla and others, and I have this way of gauging pop artists by how good no. 30 in their Top 30 is. Bach is light years ahead of Lennon-McCartney, individually and collectively, on that score and he's most likely seeing off the whole of the Motown Hit Factory, too.

It was a blessed day I picked up that box in Chichester. Maybe I should have bought the Schubert, too. 

Baltimore

 For about 45 years, I've known Baltimore as a reggae classic by the Tamlins, inevitably with the riddim section of Sly'n'Robbie, 'one of the biggest hits in Jamaica in 1979'.

And then last week I heard it by Nina Simone in what I took to be a cover version because it was reggae. And now Bob Harris has just played Randy Newman doing it. I might have been vaguely aware that he wrote it but, heaven knows, that gives you no right to be credited with the best version. He trails in a non-descript, almost tailed-off third of three, being far too pedestrian and soul-less. It doesn't even sound like a good song when he does it.

It's not going to be easy to displace The Tamlins, so imprinted on one's later formative years, as the preferred version but if anybody can do that, Nina Simone is one of the most likely to do so. Not that one has to choose. Not everything needs to be competitive sport.

One can be glad to have both. Not all three. Credit to Randy Newman for having written it but I know what it's like. I wrote a few songs, too, but it's best for their sake if I don't sing them.

 

Racetrack Wiseguy- Cheltenham 2026

 Nicky Henderson has been robbed of his big Champion Hurdle hope and the Good Lord only knows what Constitution Hill will produce but the stable has quality if not the in-depth quantity to still be optimistic about these four days of crucible, red hot racing.

Of course, we don't want to dismiss Ireland's chances because it's become almost a home fixture for them but Mr. Henderson might be 2-0 up after the Supreme and the Arkle on

Tuesday. Old Park Star (nap) and Lulamba have looked impressive against UK opposition so far. Joseph O'Brien's Talk the Talk in the Supreme might be doing exactly that but only squeaked in at Leopardstown on heavy ground. There's more to worry about in the Arkle where Kopek des Bordes presumably won like a 2/9 should last time out and Romeo Coolio only beat Kargese a neck and I'm not 100% convinced about Kargese, having once backed her and lost. The  reasons why I'm not taking ante-post prices about this opening double is that it's still five weeks away, ante-post markets are strewn with disappointed chancers and Lulamba, despite being overwhelmingly on top by the end of his races, has taken the first half of them to find his feet, which might be a plus up the Prestbury Park finish but there's just half a chance he's not flawless over the bare two miles. 

Nevertheless, it looks like we go in all big and brash. The week could be all but over by 2.10pm on the Tuesday but that's sport for you. I know several people who pay good money to go and watch Portsmouth play football. They'd understand about disappointment and, hey, Jude, the patron saint of lost causes. The plan for the rest of the week entirely depends on how those first two races go. Some years ago, one of our local 'faces' went for the whole four days and backed 24 consecutive losers. I can't see the enjoyment in that. I was told, yes but you back the favourites, don't you. Quite often, yes, I do, but that's not cheating.

Jeriko du Reponet will be given the widest of berths in the handicap because it's not a natural jumper of fences and you need to be at least that to win a big Cheltenham handicap.

The Champion Hurdle market has had to be carved up and re-written several times already so I'm not committing to that yet, if at all. I was all over The New Lion before the two runs he's had this season; the race turned out to be Lossiemouth's for the taking last year had she been put in it; I'd be angling towards Betterdaysahead at present but not with money; I'd bloody luv it if Mr. Henderson could find the old Constitution Hill but that's a challenge that might be even beyond him. Golden Ace might yet pick up another top race and become a legend almost by default. It's a complete guessing game and a bookie's benefit.

On Wednesday, if body and soul are still intact, one might think that Majborough ought to be odds on to be Champion Chaser after Leopardstown but Marine Nationale wins at Cheltenham, so far. I'd be siding with Majborough because he's three years younger with maybe more ahead of him. There could be a bet in the first, the Novice Hurdle, and it might be Doctor Steinberg on a day where I'd have to ask for odds ungenerously about Ireland overall. I might come back here and edit this as a 'living document' ( !!! ) as things become clearer.

Thursday can almost be a rest day some years. At present the market that goes 10/11, 5/4, 7/4 for the Mares Hurdle means first of all guessing which of the ladies are sent to it rather than the Champion Hurdle. Except if they all chose the perceived 'easier option' it could make it the harder one. You'd need to be a wiser guy than me to be on who runs never mind who wins. 

I wish the Ryanair Chase could establish itself as a prize as much respected as the Champion Chase or the Gold Cup. Maybe it's at a disadvantage by being sponsored by an airline known for being cheap but not cheerful. There is no reason why middle distances should be less respected than shorter or longer. It's the other way round in flat racing. And in human racing the mile, or 1500m, is at least as much of a 'gold riband' as the 100m or marathon. They put £211k up for the Ryanair which ain't bad compared to £225k for the Champion and 351k for the Gold Cup, roughly in line with how much further you have to run and how many fences you have to jump. I can't be having anything at the prices at present, though.

The fact that 11yo Bob Olinger is 6/1, third fav, for the Stayers Hurdle says a lot about how bleak and starless things are in that division. And then you notice that Doddiethegreat is 10. These by all means classy races and would be riveting stuff at Sandown or Aintree but the argument against trying to fetch more cash out of the paying customer's pocket by making Cheltenham a five day meeting is that Thursday's already like it is. There are only so many good horses to go round.

Depending on which horses have taken their chance in the Champion Hurdle on Tuesday, there will probably be a bet in the Mares Hurdle but until nearer the time I'd not be taking those prices on them running, never mind winning. 

Whereas, if one has rested on the third day, Friday and the Gold Cup is worth having. If the race brings back memories of confident disasters such as Ten Plus, Silviniaco Conti or the ante post 5/2 I was stuck with when Burrough Hill Lad won, having been given away at much more than the SP of 7/2 as Mrs. Pitman insisted that there was nothing wrong with him, it might also remind one of some winners. But not as many as it should.

But Jango Baie is a bet, at 9/2, not going overboard but a go one could have. I'm a bit surprised it's favourite but in that blanket finish of 2025's race of the year in the King George, I reckon it was the one that wanted another furlong, or two and a half. That will be some sort of business on the day or else why do I still play this game. There was much to like about Haiti Couleurs keeping up the gallop at Newbury yesterday and at 8/1 isn't out of the question or even a reverse forecast. It's a long time since I did one of them.

There will probably be a bet in the Albert Bartlett, the long distance novice hurdle, and maybe if Doctor Steinberg and No Drama This End avoid each other, given that they are both entered in the first on Wednesday, it could work out alright to bet on both races.

That's not the most imaginative plan but the bookies' profits and the poor house are maintained by those who stride in all full of imaginative plans. I'd have landed the Coral place pot yesterday, and a few weeks ago, if I hadn't gone against a well-backed favourite. One wants to get by, not break the bank. 

So it's Old Park Star. Then it's Majborough and Lulamba. And then you mix in the others mentioned in bold type here and if you're lucky, three of them might land a treble. Because you do need to be lucky as well as a wiseguy. Or not unlucky, at least.

--

Why don't we have a little game here, if anybody wants to play. Send in your treble for the week, to be calculated as a Trixie- 3 doubles and the treble. I'll publish them here before it all gets underway. The prize could be something like a Thursday afternoon in The Dolphin, Old Portsmouth, date tba, but you'd have to get your round in.

First Four Questions

The TLS has its own Twenty Questions feature. It's a long time since I ended my subscription  but their e-mail still arrives each week, giving a tempting glimpse of what one could have if one went to the lengths of finding a shop that sold their paper.

Nevertheless, a questionnaire is hard to decline even if it's only the first four questions out of twenty that one can see. It's only the same as it ever was, not being able to watch a quiz on telly without taking part and not quite as much reading these questionnaires for an insight into the inner lives of the eminent person interviewed as thinking what one would have said oneself. So, as far as it goes, 

 “How can I know what I think, until I see what I say?” (E. M. Forster). How much of your writing surprises you?

Not all that much by now. I'm unlikely to suddenly find out in the process of writing anything that I believe in God, had misjudged Boris Johnson or should have been listening to Pink Floyd and Bruckner rather than Tamla Motown and Bach and Handel. 

On the other hand, if any piece of writing doesn't find something one hadn't been expecting to say then it was probably not worth writing.

What is the first thing you remember reading or having read to you?

Thomas the Tank Engine was certainly the first book I ever borrowed from a library, Nottingham, circa 1965. There were the heroic escapades of a collie dog called Black Bob. 

But, probably like most people of my age, Janet and John was the first set text at school.

Is there a particular sentence that has stayed with you throughout your life?

Not one, no. Plenty of good lines from great poems or novels. But, an almost throwaway line that Danny Baker used to use when encourgaing listeners to take part in his radio phone-ins,

All you've got to be is any good. Not throughout my life but for about the last twenty-five years.

What is the most interesting item on your bookshelf?

It's surely got to be a book signed by a poet who I thought of as a god at the time and for a long time afterwards. My copy of Touch by Thom Gunn. I was overawed in his presence in Cambridge in 1979 when he did so and he was kind enough to make a conversational gambit. But, no. I could think of nothing to say by way of reply.

Related to that is a magazine called Navis, no.6, Summer 1997, on the back of which my name appears in block capitals as a contributor to that issue, above Gunn's in ordinary type who had been in a previous issue. I got paid just about enough for that poem to spend it on a copy of the magazine with Gunn in. 

My copy of Larkin at Sixty, ed. Thwaite, was bought from one of his secretaries that he had given it to but I have no evidence ot its provenance.