Two books ordered from a well-known distributor of most sorts of goods on Thursday arrived within 24 hours on Friday. That's not always what one wants if trying for a delivery date when one will be in but on this occasion although I was out there was no need to bother the neighbours. Impulse buys prompted by an item in the TLS, Dorothy Parker will have to wait her turn but it's preferable to have something of a pile in waiting rather than not be knowing where to go next.
--
Salvator Mundi, a horse with a big home reputation to prove, won at Punchestown just now in a matter of strides below the distance to justify the strong support and my 5/6 looked pretty compared to the 8/15 SP. That was about all there was to like about it- which is sufficient, though, with him pulling hard early, not jumping well and not looking entirely like winning until that crucial burst of acceleration. He's doubtless a big talent but that performance doesn't get him onto the Cheltenham shortlist per se.
There are a couple of names on that shortlist already but it's a least a month until any sort of preview is due. The weather is doing its best to provide a mid-season break but what racing there has been has provided a useful sequence of winners- 11 out of the last 13 horses, not at fancy prices - the best of them was 5/2, but one can hardly help but compile a tidy profit if you get so little wrong.
--
It seems like an age since the last lunchtime concert in these parts but Chichester on Tuesday is an interesting and varied programme to get us back into the rhythm, as it were and the run from here to Easter promises plenty of both familiar names of returning artists and some new in Portsmouth and Chichester.
--
Very bad news from Times Radio is the arrival of Rod Liddle, the boorish commentator so idiosyncratic that he represents the SDP although it's hard to believe that's the same SDP formed by Roy Jenkins and Shirley Williams. They've either taken a lurch to the right or have become simply a vehicle for Liddle's posturing in what he imagines to be a provocative way except it's just token garrulousness.
More in tune with enlightened sensibilities is my pile of books by Stewart Lee. How I Escaped My Certain Fate is both autobiography and transcripts of some of his shows. Of course, the likes of Morecambe & Wise and Tommy Cooper rehearsed their nonchalance to perfection and Stewart's hesitations, deviations and repetitions are of the same order as is made very clear in his extensive footnotes explaining how it all works. It is 'art' not only in the sense of making the artificial appear natural but in its openly-stated awareness of itself as art. The footnotes, the references to itself and the recurrence of discussion about other stand-up comedians all fold inwards like a postmodern thing so that while reflecting on the world it is also a contemplation of its own processes and in book form that extends to an acceptance that it's not at its best in book form.
It's a hardline defence of 'woke' to be appreciated by those who remember what 'woke' was - a good thing identified by Barack Obama and not an insult aimed at anything that narcissists, maybe like Rod Liddle, find a bit too ethical for their solipsistic world view. With his English degree from Oxford, Stewart has every right to be as literary as he is and, like an anti-Trump, he can turn all negative reaction to him to his own purposes. He is more combative and entrenched than ideally suits me, like the stand-up answer to Mark E. Smith when I'd be more at home with the Jesus & Mary Chain than The Fall. But it's a long, long time since I paid to go to see a 'comedian'- more than thirty years since Ken Dodd, I think- and so Southsea in May, we will see how much the artform has moved on.
Not necessarily for the better, I suspect. Game shows, celeb quizzes, even 'comedy' shows these days are filled with people billed as 'comedians'. Perhaps comedy did eventually become the new rock'n'roll in as far as everybody is now a comedian where once everybody was a pop star. And perhaps it has also returned to its original purpose. By no means are all of this generation of standing-up, talking performers funny but perhaps they do fit what 'comedy' once was,
The classic conception of comedy, which began with Aristotle in ancient Greece of the 4th century bce
and persists through the present, holds that it is primarily concerned
with humans as social beings, rather than as private persons, and that
its function is frankly corrective. The comic artist’s purpose is to
hold a mirror up to society to reflect its follies and vices, in the
hope that they will, as a result, be mended.
So, although that generation that attend comedy gigs and laugh at every observation because that's what they're expected to do, perhaps what they are really doing is the equivalent of going to church to be improved by what they hear in the sermon. They are brought onside by the performer who ridicules some perceived folly and emerge as better people.
I'm not saying that Tarby, Bob Hope or Ted Ray were funny but fashions change and people are made happy by thinking that they've complied with their chosen orthodoxy. I like Stewart Lee because he represents some of my chosen orthodoxy. I don't laugh at him as much as I laugh at Dad's Army, Fawlty Towers, Blackadder or The Office and I hardly ever laugh at Ricky Gervais's stand-up because I can see it coming from a mile off and I think it's a big ask for anyone to stand in front of an audience and get them onside. I'm like the second house in the Glasgow Empire on a Saturday night. Stand-up is a much over-rated art form, very difficult to be good at and most of them aren't. Rock'n'roll was easier - two or three chords, 4/4 time, a drum beat and a chorus and a roomful of people who've turned up with the intention of dancing.